Barbara Barnett the Lee Young Professor of Journalism at the William Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communications. She teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses, including introduction to mass communications, research and writing, reporting, diversity in the media, media and the military, and research methods. Her research focuses on gender and media, specifically women as victims, perpetrators, and witnesses of violence. She is a former print journalist and public relations professional.
Ph.D., Course work in communication theory, gender and media, feminist theory, standpoint epistemology, international communication, development communication, public relations, pedagogy, qualitative and quantitative research methods, and interpersonal communication, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
M.A., Liberal Studies. Literature and women's studies. Adviser: Dr. Melissa Malouf. Course work included oral history and theory of narrative, Third World literature, feminist theory, fiction writing, and an independent study on women’s writing. Master’s project was a collection of fifteen short stories (some have been published), Duke University
B.A., Pembroke State University
STATEMENT OF TEACHING PHILOSOPY
Barbara Barnett, Ph.D.
During my 12 years at KU, I have taught both skills and concept courses. These
courses varied in size, structure, content, and purpose; consequently, these courses have
presented very different challenges and required very different pedagogical strategies.
For example, our Journalism 101 course, Media and Society, is a large lecture class that typically enrolls 450 undergraduates, most of whom are freshman. One of my goals in this class has been to make it interactive—to rely less on lecture and more on class discussions. To do this, we begin each class with a "hot topic," a story "ripped from the headlines," and students discuss in small groups, then in the larger class. Afterward, we have a discussion of the readings, in which I pose questions and ask students for responses. I conduct a pre- and post-test of student knowledge each time I teach the class and use results to refine presentations for the next semester. In this class I also ask students to participate in a media fast, in which they try to live without media for 24 hours. I tell them I don't expect them to complete the fast, but to write about what the experience of no media was like. This assignment helps students reflect on their media use and the prevalence of media in their lives, but it also helps me understand their knowledge, attitude, and values. (With students' permission, I share results with journalism faculty to help professors understand the perspective of students who are entering our school).
When teaching Journalism 534, Diversity in Media, I work to help students develop media products that offer more accurate and authentic representations of the society in which we live and to help students understand how media texts and images convey values about who matters in society and who does not. I teach diversity as a job skill, and I encourage students to think about how the media messages they will create affect audiences. I evaluate students' work in several ways: a series of response papers, in which students write about their reaction to a television program, such as the Oscars or the Super Bowl, and discuss how they saw or did not see elements of diversity (awareness); a profile story of a person who is not like the student (analysis of differences); and a research report, in which students analyze some form of media and say how diversity is or is not present (advocacy). I use grading rubrics to evaluate each assignment, and I use mid-semester course evaluations, in which I ask students to tell me one thing that is going well and one thing they wish would change. This helps me understand student concerns. I discuss these concerns with students and explain what I will do to correct or modify.
I have created two undergraduate courses at KU. One, Journalism 500/720, Media and the Military, explored journalists' coverage of the military, and KU students worked with officers attending the Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth to help them learn about the media's role in democracy. In this class, students were evaluated on media stories they produced but also how well they worked with or taught officers. In addition, I created a Media and Satire course for the Honors program, designed to explore how fake news highlights larger truths and uses humor to discuss topics that may be uncomfortable. Students' final project was to produce their own piece of media satire, and they were evaluated, using a rubric, on how well they communicated their ideas.
In the journalism school, undergraduate advising is done informally. Faculty members mentor students about career choices and options. My work in this area has been to meet with students to talk about courses to study in journalism, career choices, and internships. This was a major part of my job as associate dean.
Graduate advising and mentoring
I have made a conscious effort to work with students in our masters and doctoral programs. This has involved teaching courses in research methods, media and popular culture, and qualitative research. In those classes, we have focused on practical and theoretical projects. For example, in one research methods class we conducted an online readership survey for the Prairie Village Post newspaper. My work with grad students also has involved supervising four independent studies since 2010, as well as serving as chair of 10 master's committees and one doctoral committee. Additionally, I currently am working with a doctoral student on a study of how journalists work in violent environments, and this has resulted in a conference paper, which has been submitted to a journal. Also, I continue to work with past KU students who are now professors at other universities. I worked with a former student, now a Marist University, on a conference paper about media coverage of rape in the military; the paper was published. And I am working with another former student on a research project about postpartum depression in social media.
As a feminist scholar, I have thought long and hard about how my research
Intersects with my teaching, and I have worked to bring into the classroom some of the
principles that guide my research. Feminist pedagogy parallels my focus on student-centered teaching because it challenges the notion of the teacher as ultimate authority.
Feminist pedagogy promotes the sharing of authority between teacher and student,
challenges the perspective of the student as passive recipient of knowledge, and suggests
that teachers focus on the process of learning rather than the products of learning (tests
and grades). With this in mind, I have worked to make my classrooms participatory—to
encourage students to play a role in their own learning. This sharing of authority does not mean I abandon my responsibilities as a teacher and that students go without direction; it does mean that I work more as a coach and a mentor than an instructor.
My teaching philosophy is one of student-centered learning, which means keeping a focus on both short-terms goals, such as effective use of class time, student success in class, and interactive learning, as well as long-term goals, such as preparation of students to become thoughtful and ethical media communications professionals. I think of the courses I teach as dynamic—they must grow and change. Each semester I re-think the courses I teach, with the aim of updating the course content and making it more relevant to students' lives. I ask students for their feedback and ideas, and I work to incorporate their suggestions. While I work to help students learn the skills and values necessary to be good communicators, I also learn from students about how to be a more thoughtful, creative teacher.
- Diversity and media
- Research methods
- Media and the military.
Gender, media, and violence, including research on women who have been perpetrators, survivors, and witnesses of violence. This includes media coverage of women who kill their children and myths about motherhood; motherhood in "mommy blogs;" newspaper coverage of women who are victims/survivors of rape and sex trafficking; media representations of women's health; portrayals of female athletes in journalism and on websites; and, the tension between women's narratives and the "masculine" style of journalistic storytelling.
- Qualitative methods
Since coming to KU, my service has been at the school and university level. I formerly served as associate dean, working to ensure that students had the tools and resources to be successful at KU and beyond. That meant information about scholarships, a curriculum that gave them skills to practice their profession competently and with integrity.
Since leaving that job, I have served as chair of the school's curriculum and assessment committee.
Vu, H. Duong, T. Lee, T. & Barnett, B. (in press). Gendering leadership in Vietnamese media: A role congruity study on news content and journalists' perceptions of female and male leaders. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, In press.
Vu, H. Duong, H. Barnett, B. & Lee, T. (2017). A role (in)congruity study on Vietnamese journalists' perception of female and male leadership. Asian Journal of Communications, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1318155
Barnett, B. A. (2017). Girls Gone Web:
Self-depictions of Female Athletes on Personal Websites.
Barnett, B. (2016). Motherhood in the Media: Infanticide, Journalism, and the Digital Age, Routledge.
Hoffman, H. C., & Barnett, B. (2015). Apologia and rape: How the U.S. military framed two cases of sexual assault.
Barnett, B. A. (2015). Dividing Women: Magazines’ Framing of Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation. Feminist Media Studies.
Barnett, B. A. (2014). Sex trafficking in mass media: Gender, power, and personal economies. In . (Ed.), UNESCO Global Alliance on Media and Communication.
Barnett, B. (2013). The babe/baby factor: Gender and sports. In . (Ed.), The Sports Communication Handbook (pp. 350-358).
Barnett, B. (2013). Toward authenticity: Using feminist theory to construct journalistic narratives of maternal violence. Feminist Media Studies, 13(3).
Barnett, B. (2013). How newspapers frame rape: The Duke University case. Women & Language, 35(2), 11-33.
Barnett, B. & Hardin, M. (2011). Advocacy from the liberal feminist playbook: The framing of Title IX and women’s sports in news releases from the Women’s Sports Foundation. International Journal of Sports Communication, 4(2), 178–197.
Barnett, B. (2010). Medea in the media: Narrative and myth in news stories about women who kill their children. In D. Berkowitz (Ed.), Cultural meanings of news: A text reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Walker, D. Geertsema, M. & Barnett, B. (2009). Inverting the inverted pyramid: Using feminist theories to teach journalism. Feminist Teacher, 19(3), 177–194.
Barnett, B. (2008). More contradictions: A framing analysis of health, agency, and femininity in a magazine for women over forty. In M. Wiley (Ed.), Women, wellness, and media . Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Barnett, B. (2008). Framing rape: An examination of public relations strategies in the Duke University lacrosse case. Communication, Culture, Critique, 1(2), 17–202.
Barnett, B. (2007). Women who defy nature: Maternal infanticide and journalists’ use of the myth of perfection. In K. Hart (Ed.), Media(ted) Deviance and Social Otherness: Interrogating Influential Representations (pp. 91–112). Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Barnett, B. (2006). Embracing the imaginary good mother: Narratives of love and violence from women who killed their children. Iowa Journal of Communication, 38(1), 5-26.
Barnett, B. (2006). Focusing on the next picture: Feminist pedagogy as a foundation for teaching about ageism in the academy. NWSA Journal, 8(1), 85-98.
Barnett, B. (2006). Health as women’s work: A pilot study on how women’s magazines frame medical news and femininity. Women and Language, 29(2), 1-11.
Barnett, B. (2006). Medea in the media: Narrative and myth in news stories about women who kill their children. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 7(4), 411–433.
Barnett, B. (2005). Feminists shaping news: A framing analysis of news releases from the National Organization for Women. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(4), 341-362.
Barnett, B. (2005). Perfect mother or artist of obscenity? A narrative analysis of news coverage of the Andrea Yates murders. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29(1), 9-29.
Barnett, B. (2004). [Review of the book Converging media: An introduction to mass communication/Sex and the Single Beer Can: Probing the Media and American Culture , John Pavlik & Shawn McIntosh/Walt Brasch]. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 59(3), 313-315.
Barnett, B. (2004). Emma says: A case study of the use of comics for health education among women in the AIDS heartland. Feminist Media Studies, 4(2), 111-128.
Barnett, B. & Schueller, J. (2000). Meeting the needs of young clients: A guide to providing reproductive health services to adolescents. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
Barnett, B. (1999). The impact of family planning on women’s lives: Findings from the Women’s Studies Project in Mali and Zimbabwe. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 3(1), 27-38.
Barnett, B. (1999). Defiance of the weaker vessel. Cold Mountain Review, 41-56.
Barnett, B. (1998). Surprises. Southern Exposure, 25(3&4), 16–18.
Rivera, R. Hardee, K. & Barnett, B. (1998). Chapter 5. International and national public health issues. In V. V. Ragavan (Ed.), Drug development for women. London, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Barnett, B. (1998). Look who’s talking: Policy-makers, community members, and researchers discuss population and development issues. In M. Mhloyi (Ed.), Women’s participation in development: The role of family planning (pp. 76-92). Harare, Zimbabwe: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Barnett, B. (1998). Family planning use often a family decision: Better ways are needed to involve relatives, who may influence contraceptive choices. Network, 18(4), 14-18.
Barnett, B. & Stein, J. (1998). Women’s voices, women’s lives: The impact of family planning. A synthesis of findings from the Women’s Studies Project. Family Health International Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
Barnett, B. (1998). Armistice. Minerva Quarterly, 26(1), 5-11.
Barnett, B. (1997). Li. The Journal of Graduate Liberal Studies, 3(1), 59-69.
Barnett, B. (1997). Gender norms affect adolescents: Gender perspectives in education, services, and training can lead to better reproductive health for youth. Network, 17(3), 1-5.
Barnett, B. (1997). A war story. The Journal of Graduate Liberal Studies, 2(2), 21-26.
Barnett, B. (1997). Armistice. Voices, 20–22.
Barnett, B. (1997). The high cost of stories. Hurricane Alice: A Feminist Review, 12(2), 7-8.
Barnett, B. (1996). Family planning reduces mortality. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 34(118), 206-211.
Barnett, B. Hardee, K. Eggleston, E. & Jackson, J. (1996). The program for adolescent mothers: A case study of women-centered health care in Jamaica.
Barnett, B. (1995). Family planning rarely available for refugees: Providing adequate reproductive health services is especially difficult when serving displaced persons. Network, 15(3), 1-6.
Barnett, B. (1994). Family planning and development: ‘If a woman is hungry, you cannot talk to her about family planning’. Network, 15(1), 1-5.
Barnett, B. (1992). North Carolina hospitals: 2001. Contrasting societal needs with health care trends. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Hospital Association.
Barnett, B. (1992). Who decides? You decide. A guide for health care providers in understanding right-to-die laws. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Hospital Association.